|
I regret having to share with you this piece of news: the
Lua-in-Kernel project on NetBSD is no longer maintained. I don't know if it has been abandoned for good or may be resumed at a later date. What is confirmed is that Marc, the maintainer, has abandoned the project. As far as I know, nobody else has stepped in. What a pity. For those who were not familiar with the idea, the Lua-in-Kernel project (also called Lunatik) aimed at rendering the NetBSD kernel scriptable with Lua, so that the kernel functioning could be easily tweaked on-the-fly with a simple script. Any volunteers willing to step in? |
|
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:16, sergei karhof <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I regret having to share with you this piece of news: the > Lua-in-Kernel project on NetBSD is no longer maintained. I don't know > if it has been abandoned for good or may be resumed at a later date. > What is confirmed is that Marc, the maintainer, has abandoned the > project. As far as I know, nobody else has stepped in. What a pity. > For those who were not familiar with the idea, the Lua-in-Kernel > project (also called Lunatik) aimed at rendering the NetBSD kernel > scriptable with Lua, so that the kernel functioning could be easily > tweaked on-the-fly with a simple script. > Any volunteers willing to step in? > I don't know enough about BSD or kernels to do such a thing, but I did think it was a really interesting project. In theory you could have a whole OS written in Lua, save for some C code to provide interfaces to the hardware... -- Sent from my toaster. |
|
In reply to this post by sergei karhof
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:16:08AM +0100, sergei karhof wrote:
> I regret having to share with you this piece of news: the > Lua-in-Kernel project on NetBSD is no longer maintained. I don't know > if it has been abandoned for good or may be resumed at a later date. > What is confirmed is that Marc, the maintainer, has abandoned the > project. As far as I know, nobody else has stepped in. What a pity. > For those who were not familiar with the idea, the Lua-in-Kernel > project (also called Lunatik) aimed at rendering the NetBSD kernel > scriptable with Lua, so that the kernel functioning could be easily > tweaked on-the-fly with a simple script. > Any volunteers willing to step in? > That’s a shame… I was really interested in this project, as a NetBSD and Lua lover… If anybody take this project back, I’ll be glad to contribute, but I’m not experienced enough to do it entierly on my own. |
|
i am working on a "HyPhy" BSD project, which is FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT / CVS HEAD sources with updated GPLv3 sources merged in. definitely not a GSOC project lol. i'll find some time this weekend to see about merging the Lunatik code into the kernel. Waitman Gobble |
|
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Waitman Gobble <[hidden email]> wrote:
> i'll find some time this weekend to see about merging the Lunatik code into > the kernel. You mean into the FreeBSD kernel, of course, don't you? |
|
Hi, yes, it's the FreeBSD kernel. so far i've been tinkering with obliterating userland :) but now getting to the point of fiddling with the kernel. The machine still boots and runs. Waitman |
|
In reply to this post by Rena
Its sad, but honestly I didn't quite get the point. Nowadays (at least
on Linux) there are very few things you couldn't do in a userspace process. This includes User space drivers. The only thing you can't do is interrupt handling, and I don't believe that an interrupt handler is one the things you would have Lua in it anyway. > I don't know enough about BSD or kernels to do such a thing, but I did > think it was a really interesting project. In theory you could have a > whole OS written in Lua, save for some C code to provide interfaces to > the hardware... That would be a Mach kernel, where the other drivers being infact processes would be coded in Lua. PS: Please don't say three times Beattlejuice and have that "Lua OS" guy popping back. |
|
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Axel Kittenberger <[hidden email]> wrote:
> PS: Please don't say three times Beattlejuice and have that "Lua OS" > guy popping back. LOL!! |
|
In reply to this post by sergei karhof
sergei karhof wrote:
> What is confirmed is that Marc, the maintainer, has abandoned the > project. He seems to disappear from NetBSD and lua-l lists. Do you know whether he hosted the project somewhere with public access? Alex |
|
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Nasonov <[hidden email]> wrote:
> sergei karhof wrote: >> What is confirmed is that Marc, the maintainer, has abandoned the >> project. > > He seems to disappear from NetBSD and lua-l lists. Do you know whether > he hosted the project somewhere with public access? Don't know that. The best way is to contact him directly. You've got his email, I assume (from the mailing list). |
|
In reply to this post by sergei karhof
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16 AM, sergei karhof <[hidden email]> wrote:
> (...) > Any volunteers willing to step in? I'm one.. I want to retake my efforts. Can you help in something? Cheers, -- Lourival Vieira Neto |
|
In reply to this post by Waitman Gobble
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Waitman Gobble <[hidden email]> wrote:
> (...) > i'll find some time this weekend to see about merging the Lunatik code into > the kernel. If you need any help, please, let me know.. Cheers, -- Lourival Vieira Neto |
|
In reply to this post by Kooda
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Kooda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> (...) > That’s a shame… I was really interested in this project, as a NetBSD and Lua > lover… > If anybody take this project back, I’ll be glad to contribute, but I’m not > experienced enough to do it entierly on my own. All help is welcome =). Feel free to contact me directly. Cheers, -- Lourival Vieira Neto |
|
In reply to this post by Lourival Vieira Neto
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Lourival Vieira Neto <[hidden email]> wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Waitman Gobble <[hidden email]> wrote: Thank you. I presume the latest and greatest code is on http://netbsd-soc.sourceforge.net/projects/luakern/
Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA |
|
In reply to this post by Alexander Nasonov
Am 24.03.2012 04:45, schrieb Alexander Nasonov:
> sergei karhof wrote: >> What is confirmed is that Marc, the maintainer, has abandoned the >> project. > > He seems to disappear from NetBSD and lua-l lists. Do you know whether > he hosted the project somewhere with public access? FWIW, I am still on lua-l ;) And any rumors of my death are greatly exaggerated... |
|
update, i merged into 10.0-current src on a "stock" 386 machine, (not tinkered with) and have an initial list of things to track down. might not get back to it till wednesday. Waitman Gobble |
|
In reply to this post by Waitman Gobble
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Waitman Gobble <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thank you. you're welcome.. > I presume the latest and greatest code is on > http://netbsd-soc.sourceforge.net/projects/luakern/ yes. Cheers, -- Lourival Vieira Neto |
|
awesome, that's the place i got the code :) Waitman |
|
In reply to this post by Lourival Vieira Neto
Am 27.03.2012 18:30, schrieb Lourival Vieira Neto:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Waitman Gobble<[hidden email]> wrote: >> Thank you. > > you're welcome.. > >> I presume the latest and greatest code is on >> http://netbsd-soc.sourceforge.net/projects/luakern/ > > yes. The latest and greatest code has not been released or published anywhere, fwiw. |
|
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Marc Balmer <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Am 27.03.2012 18:30, schrieb Lourival Vieira Neto: > >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Waitman Gobble<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thank you. >> >> >> you're welcome.. >> >>> I presume the latest and greatest code is on >>> http://netbsd-soc.sourceforge.net/projects/luakern/ >> >> >> yes. > > > The latest and greatest code has not been released or published anywhere, > fwiw. see http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~uno/programs.html ;-) -- Lourival Vieira Neto |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
